 |
Publishing Case Studies and Papers |
Paper -
Content, Content, Content
Martyn
Daniels, VP Marketing, Media Publishing, VCIL
Delivered to EBOG Digital Publishing Conference,
Nationalmuseet, Copenhagen, May 2008
Digitization is a complex publishing issue and is not unlike
climate change in that we all know that it’s happening and
we all know the impact is going to be significant, however,
no one knows when, by how much and what the result will be.
Like climate change it also has its dome mongers, prophets
and analysts and wild predictions.
Today we
see a relentless bombardment of press and media coverage on
the digitisation of the book. The book is dead, the book is
digital, the book will survive. Penguin is doing this,
Hatchette is doing that, HarpeCollins is adopting this,
Cambridge University Press that. Amazon has bought this,
Sony has launched that. ,
As one who writes on publishing digitization issues, it is
often hard to distinguish the news from the noise, the
public posturing, from the real initiatives. It is not
surprising therefore that the press often gets it wrong and
those that get the biggest headlines are the major
publishers and often the news is mere noise.
So will
the book die? No, unlike music it is already the content,
the format and a reader. It will be the major format for
many years and represent the major sales revenue for all.
However
there are two issues.
Firstly, the book has joined together a number of different
sectors into one. As we digitize then these differences will
become more distinct and the various sectors will diverge
often in different directions and at different speeds. This
in turn will create a further challenge to distinguishing
between news and noise.
Secondly,
we all love and are comfortable with books. Authors love to
write them, editors love to edit them and readers love to
read them. We have been educated with them and have grown up
with them. If asked to describe a book many would describe
its size, even the number of pages and authors the number of
words. All books consist of front matter, content and end
matter.
I would
suggest that the form has always dictated the content format
and its creation. Some would argue that the bound book has
been a straightjacket to creativity in that it has dictated
what many write even how they write. Have creators adapted
to it? Yes. Have some great works been created in it? Yes.
However,
digitization now creates the opportunity to explode the
spine of what we have known for the last few centuries and
present content differently. Will it replace the book? No.
Will it help redefine it and how we develop and sell it –
most definitely? Will the digital book be the same as the
physical one. I hope not otherwise we will have fallen into
the same trap as we did between the hardback and the
paperback and to a lesser degree the audiobook.
In
removing the straightjacket we also start to potentially
express ourselves differently. Look at some online reference
works, at what travel publishers are now starting to do with
their content and what authors such as Kate Pullinger are
doing. There are many examples we could quote as reference
and some will work and others will not. But the common
thread and enabler is digitization.
Is that
wrong or right? Who cares? Creativity and expression is not
a book nor is it a blog or anything between. Dickens wrote
in instalments as did Stephen King when he wrote ‘Riding the
Bullet’ and some Japanese authors are doing similar today in
their writing for mobiles. You can’t squeeze multi media in
between a cardboard jacket nor create it as an afterthought.
So what of
this digital landscape? We have ebooks, audio downloads,
kiosks, online, social sites, print on demand and what
appears to be a new device every year.
But this is where we have to understand that digitisation is
not about ebooks, audio downloads, online, podcasts, blogs,
widgets etc. these are merely the delivery and marketing
formats. It is about the creation, development and
distribution of content, the development and distribution of
the contextual information that supports and helps qualify
content and rights that are acquired, developed, produced,
marketed, sold and read. It is also about the changing roles
and relationships rights across the life cycle from Author
to Reader.
It is about Publishing and digital publishing being
publishing. It is about the three words that are publishing;
Content, Content, Content
When you
look at the current roles within the publishing life cycle
We see the Author as the content creator, the publisher as
the content Manger, the retailers and libraries as the
content portals and the readers as the content consumers.
When we look at it this we have to ask what it means to
manage content and is it different from managing books. What
does it means to be a portal and is that different from a
bookshop or library.
When I
wrote the Brave New World report there were many changes
that we recognized impacted the digital environment. Time
doesn’t permit me to go through them all but here are three
which you may wish to consider.
First.
When we read we all read differently according to the role
we play the criticality of he content and what we want from
it. If you were to place an academic book in front of a
student, a researcher, a lecturer, a librarian they would
probably use and digest the content differently. This
doesn’t matter when they are all reading the same book but
when the content is digital these differences can become
marked. Therefore when content is presented digitally we now
need to understand the demands of the audience reading it.
We also need to respect that the audience may have different
demands and may not all wish to digest the same way.
Which audience do you build your content for, or do you
build the flexibility to accommodate all?
Secondly
the world is now consumer centric. Digitization has broken
down the communication barriers that once existed in the old
world and has created ‘My World’ and social networking. This
has even extended to consumers contributing to as well as
commenting on content. The reader now can communicate
effectively with the creator and the creators communicate
directly with their audience and fan base. They no longer
need an intermediary or interpreter. So do publisher provide
the total platform and experience or merely the content and
leave others to build the relationships?
Thirdly,
the value chain between the creator and the reader changes
when the transaction and communication goes online. In the
pure physical world readers value the selection of the
bookseller, the quality of the content provided by the
publisher and access to what they need on the high street.
In the digital online world irrespective of whether the
readers want a physical or digital rendition, the value
flips. They now seek aggregation, search and discovery,
authentication and relevance, and trusted and reliable
management and fulfillment. This change is both significant
and can influence the channel to market.
So I have
talked about the issues raised in the Brave New World report
but what about the publisher and their part in the life
cycle? I would like to offer some considerations you may
wish to review in developing your digital strategies.
Fist is
where do you start? Here we split the publisher’s part of
the life cycle into composition (the development and
production of the content), conversion (the transformation
of the content from one format to another) and distribution
(the presentation and fulfillment to the channel). Where
does the publisher start to digitise?
Do they
start at the beginning of the process, or the middle or in
several places?
Many to-date have taken their back list and converted it to
digital content. This means that they are not impacting on
their editorial and production processes and that they can
focus on converting the winners so reducing investment.
Others have taken the opportunity to start at the
typesetting stage, effectively digitally typesetting for
editing in XML and rendering into PDF for print. Others have
now started to go back to the manuscript and change the
previous analogue process and make it digital all the way
through. Irrespective of the route adopted the key is to
hold the content once and not build DAM, DAR and DAD silos.
Today we
produce textural works and if we want to add any multi media
it is often as an afterthought or at the end of the process.
To produce media neutral output you have to be able to
process all media through the process and thereby
accommodate media neutral input. It is not about text and
books but media and content.
We talk
about content but associated with every piece of content is
rights and what I refer to as context, the information that
describes content and enables you to qualify, value and
purchase it. Time does allow me to talk about rights in the
digital world but to say they grow in importance, have a
different emphasis and present opportunities in their own
right. What I would like to point out is that content,
context and rights all coexist across the life cycle and
that probably 85% of all context is drawn directly from the
content itself but today is often held in different silos
and is administered by transaction orientated systems.
Viewing the three together one can see new opportunities
that do not exist in today’s analogue world.
The final
consideration is the most obvious. It demands that digital
repositories are built to accommodate the total organization
and not just part of it. The rights, editorial, production,
sales, marketing, publicity and fulfillment people will all
want different views of the same content, context and
rights. It’s like looking into the same house but through
different windows it’s the same house but we all see
something different. It may be interesting to know that in
the last 18 months I have sat down with many publishers and
publishing boards and covered a wide spectrum of digital
issues but only once have I met a Rights Director.
Publishing is a rights business and they are integral to
digitization but appear not to be visible in the strategy.
You may
now start to understand why I believe Digital Publishing is
Publishing
So what is
happening and what are some of the changes taking place
today. The following examples are drawn directly from our
experience.
Editorial and production potentially offers much. We are
all familiar with the editorial production flow from the
author to the printer. The process may vary but the basic
tasks exist and as we are all aware the flow will always
involve reiterations and these can be sometimes complex.
This complexity increases with the number of people involved
and also the complexity of the product.
Two major publishers HarperCollins and Cengage Learning
decided to collaborate on a series of English-language
dictionaries for non-native speakers. HarperCollins was in
the UK and Cengage was in the US.
HarperCollins produced the A-Z standard text while Cengage
was to produce the boxed ‘features,’ used to explain words
and their usage to non-native speakers. Thousands of entries
were being updated continuously, with features sprinkled on
every page of the book. Some 15 dictionaries had to be
produced on a very tight schedule. Content and style changes
to these features meant accessing several hundred files at a
time. And integrating these features within the A-Z text of
the main dictionary presented additional hurdles and
stretched the time and cost to produce the finished books.
Web-based
collaboration editing was introduced with built-in workflow
features which advised each user what they need to work on
next at a fragment level. All communication was also fully
integrated between the system and email.
While editors work within a familiar rich-editing Word-like
WYSIWIG (what you see is what you get) environment, the
content is actually stored in XML. Any editor can ‘render’
an entry, or page, and generate a PDF to see what it looks
like on demand in real time. In another publisher we enabled
both automatic rendering into both PDF and HTML.
All
comments, emails, documents, are stored allowing everyone to
see the portions of the project relevant to them and roll
back and forward can be performed by those authorised. At
publication time, content can be automatically generated
into a particular publication and transform it into a format
that can be easily imported by HarperCollin’s production and
composition systems.
Cengage
Learning achieved a cost reduction saving of 90% reducing
the cost from some $10,000 to around $800. Productivity
improved, replacing the old time-consuming
‘author-composition-proof-circulate-review-comment-correct-back-to-composition’
circle, ‘Time to market’ was radically reduced and much
more.
Collaborative Editing isn’t the only digital Editorial
opportunity.
Taylor and Francis have developed and adopted a XML-first
workflow which goes back the manuscript. This effectively
automates the decomposition of the manuscript into a series
of quality steps and automated XML tagging which is managed
by exception by the copy editor. The result is that the
editor can then copy edit the pure text and once finalized
can then activate an automated process that re-composition
the work and produces a fully typesetter ready file.
The effect
has been to greatly reduce the cost of producing structured
content, particularly compared to XML-last workflows. It
also has dramatically reduced time to market and improved
productivity. We now are migrating the software onto a
different platform with Taylor and Francis and will be
deploying it in the market.
We have also deployed XML First services with many other
clients where the process has given them up to 40% cost
savings.
Marketing has seen an explosion of digital
opportunities. You only need to open up any trade paper to
read about the exciting new marketing materials and
initiatives aimed at increasing sales. Podcasts, videos,
first chapters, reviews etc. Digitisation is enabling people
to see more contextual information than ever before. I
remember when Amazon first started to demand jackets and the
wholesalers started their ‘book in hand’ programmes. The
world has moved on and the jacket is now da facto and no
longer enough.
We are
building the digital warehouse and infrastructure to support
Gardners Books, the UK’s largest wholesaler. Today we have
to deal with every conceivable digital file you could
imagine. One major publisher had over a thousand author
video clips.
No one can
be immune to the rise of the mighty widget. In less than a
year it has clearly made an impact and given publishers the
opportunity to share a limited part of the book itself with
the consumers. It may be the first 10 pages, the first
chapter or any combination of the total work. It offers full
search inside and the also the ability for the consumer to
copy the widget to friends or post it on a web site or blog.
The widget
we have developed is built on our online reader and is being
deployed by Taylor and Francis, CUP and Gardner’s publishing
clients. We will be deployed over 20,000 in the coming month
and producing them as standard to all our clients as part of
their deliverables.
We must
remember that widgets will sell both physical and digital
content.
This next diagram is about the difference between widgets
and inspection copies.
Widgets are for mass market and are deployed as samplers to
all and sundry. Inspection copies are about reviewing titles
for adoption and are prevail in the academic world. They are
more direct targeting mailings are critical in some sectors.
It is estimated that somewhere between 6 and 12% of print
runs are given away as gratis copies.
We are
working with a number of publishers to develop an online
inspection copy service that not only will reduce the cost
of inventory and postage but also enable publishers to see
who actually reads what, potentially capture and share
annotations, bookmarks and recommendations and even help
create ecompileTM customised works that
can be used by the reviewer or sold to others.
Many are
looking at the same issues but merely replacing the physical
with digital copy. They miss the prize of developing closure
relationships, understanding their clients and closing the
marketing loop. If we save only 50% of today’s waste it will
be good but if we increase sales and adoptions as well then
it is not an opportunity to be missed.
Finally
one of the exciting opportunities - Digital Drop ShipTM
When I
embarked on digital drop shipment some 2 years ago, I was
amazed that no one had really thought this out. To me it was
simple and logical. Why distribute all your files to
everyone when you can retain them, hold them once and
distribute them when someone buys one.
Digital drop ship enables the publisher to retain control,
ensure DRM standards are applied and that they know exactly
what has been sold. They can literally enable anyone to sell
their titles and only need to agree the commercials.
Importantly it mirrors the highly successful drop ship model
used in the physical world and therefore if implemented in
parallel enables physical, digital and audio to be bought in
the same basket.
The model
is now real within Gardners Books where thousands of files
are being deposited today by publishers. The likes of Taylor
and Francis and others are retaining their files separately
in their own repositories but are connected and can respond
and distribute files when sold via the service. The service
is therefore truly inclusive allowing all to participate.
Gardners are now busy rolling it out to their 1,500 internet
accounts which range from Play.com and Tesco to independent
bookstore and enabling them all to offer customers digital
content.
But digital drop ship is not just about Gardners. We have
also developed a further feature which now enables Taylor
and Francis to sell on line subscriptions within the drop
ship model. The first store to sell these will come on line
this month and will promote the subscription, manage the
consumer, handle the transaction and control subsequent
access and authentication. We will just service up the
subscription for their individual’s term.
This
enables Taylor and Francis to sell subscription through any
outlet and obviously potentially generate more sales without
incurring any more cost.
We also
have gone live with a UK publisher who were unable to enable
their web site to interact with the drop ship messages but
are taking drop ship orders on the phone via their customer
service desk. The service operator merely enters the details
on a web service. The distribution of the file from
somewhere else is totally transparent to the consumer and
importantly retailers who would be unable to participate in
the digital world, now can.
Unlike
climate change, it is not time to defend ourselves against
the threat but it is time to engage with it and as Gail
Rebuck eloquently said in her speech last month, see it as a
glass half full and offering all new and exciting
opportunities for all.
|